Published Sepember 27, 2021. Open access. | Purchase book ❯ |
Reticulate Worm Snake (Amerotyphlops reticulatus)
Reptiles of Ecuador | Serpentes | Typhlopidae | Amerotyphlops reticulatus
English common name: Reticulate Worm Snake.
Spanish common name: Culebra termitera reticulada, serpiente ciega gigante (Ecuador), culebra ciega (Colombia).
Recognition: ♂♂ 35.2 cmMaximum distance from the snout to the tip of the tail. ♀♀ 52 cmMaximum distance from the snout to the tip of the tail..1 Amerotyphlops reticulatus may be identified from other snake species by having ventral and dorsal scales of the same size, and the dorsal head scales similar in shape to the body scales, but bigger.2,3 Also, characteristic of this snake is the sharply pointed tail, the round snout, and the small and vestigial eyes.4–6 The dorsal coloration is glossy black to dark grayish brown (Fig. 1), the venter is yellowish cream, the snout is white, and there is a white or yellowish cream tail ring.2,7 In Ecuador, A. reticulatus can be distinguished from other snakes that have vestigial eyes, such as those in the genera Trilepida and Epictia, by being larger, having a light ring on snout and tail, an enlarged rostral scale, and scales between eyes similar in shape to the dorsal scales.2,3,8
Natural history: Amerotyphlops reticulatus is an extremely rare snake that occurs in a variety of habitats ranging from pristine rainforests and grasslands to cultivated fields (manioc, sugarcane, African oil palm), pastures, and rural gardens.7–12 Reticulate Worm Snakes are fossorial (living underground), being found mostly in ants and termite galleries,4,5 in leaf-litter, or buried under the soil.13 They also occasionally dwell on the surface level, on soil4,11 or on roads.9,11 This species is mostly active at night,9,11 but there are records of individuals out in the open during the day, a behavior probably forced by the flooding of the burrows, since these snakes are extremely sensitive to light and prefer to remain in the dark.4,9,11 Analyses of stomach contents indicate that this snake feeds primarily on ants (genus Atta) and their eggs, termites, and beetles (Staphylinidae).4,5,11 The Reticulate Worm Snake is not venomous. When threatened, individuals usually try to escape and hide; if handled, these snakes thrash the body, push the sharp tail-tip against the threat, and secrete a fetid substance.4,7,11 There are records of coral snakes (Micrurus helleri, Micrurus obscurus, and M. langsdorffi)14,15 preying upon individuals of A. reticulatus. In Brazil, one female A. reticulatus laid 10 eggs in March, and three hatched after a 52 day incubation period.7
Conservation: Least Concern Believed to be safe from extinction given current circumstances..12,16 Globally and in Ecuador, Amerotyphlops reticulatus is considered to be not threatened, because the species is widely distributed, present in major protected areas, and is currently facing no major widespread extinction threats.12 Also, the Reticulate Worm Snake appears to tolerate moderate habitat transformations, although it is more abundant in forested areas.4,9,11 Some studies report individuals killed by vehicular traffic.9,17 Likewise, the species could suffer local population declines due to the habitat destruction and the excessive use of pesticides that decimate insect populations, such as leafcutter ants, which are crucial to the survival of A. reticulatus.9
Distribution: Amerotyphlops reticulatus is native to an area of approximately 1,112,540 km2 throughout the Amazon lowlands and adjacent foothills of the Andes in Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador (Fig. 2), French Guiana, Guyana, Perú, Suriname, and Venezuela.18 The species also occurs, albeit marginally, in the Caatinga xeric shrubland and El Chaco plains ecosystems in Brazil and Bolivia, respectively.18 There are records of A. reticulatus east of the Andes in the Chocó and Río Magdalena valley regions of Colombia.1
Etymology: The genus name Amerotyphlops is a masculine noun formed by the Latin word americanus (=from America) and the Greek word typhlops (=the blind).6 The name refers both to the geographic distribution of snakes in the genus as well as their small rudimentary eyes.6 The specific epithet reticulatus is a Latin word meaning “net pattern.” It probably refers to the dorsal color pattern, in which the pale edges of each scale overlap and form a faint reticulation.
See it in the wild: In Ecuador, Reticulate Worm Snakes are unlikely to be seen more than once every few months at any given locality. In an oil field in Yasuní National Park, five individuals were dug up from the ground as bulldozers were clearing a patch of pristine rainforest. In central Brazil, one study reports that most individuals were captured in pitfall traps.7
Authors: Andrés F. Aponte-Gutiérrez,aAffiliation: Grupo de Biodiversidad y Recursos Genéticos, Instituto de Genética, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.,bAffiliation: Fundación Biodiversa Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia. Juan Acosta-Ortiz,cAffiliation: Universidad de los Llanos. Villavicencio, Colombia. and Leonardo Niño-CárdenasdAffiliation: Laboratorio de Anfibios, Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Editor: Alejandro ArteagaeAffiliation: Tropical Herping (TH), Quito, Ecuador.
Photographer: Jose VieiraeAffiliation: Tropical Herping (TH), Quito, Ecuador.,fAffiliation: ExSitu, Quito, Ecuador.
How to cite? Aponte-Gutiérrez A, Acosta-Ortiz J, Niño-Cárdenas L (2021) Reticulate Worm Snake (Amerotyphlops reticulatus). In: Arteaga A, Bustamante L, Vieira J (Eds) Reptiles of Ecuador: Life in the middle of the world. Available from: www.reptilesofecuador.com. DOI: 10.47051/OPBO5126
Literature cited:
- Caicedo-Portilla JR (2011) Dimorfismo sexual y variación geográfica de la serpiente ciega Typhlops reticulatus (Scolecophidia: Typhlopidae) y distribución de otras especies del género en colombia. Caldasia 33: 221–234.
- Dixon JR, Hendricks FS (1979) The wormsnakes (Family Typhlopidae) of the neotropics, exclusive of the Antilles. Zoologische Verhandelingen 173: 3–39.
- Peters JA, Orejas-Miranda B (1970) Catalogue of Neotropical Squamata: part I, snakes. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, Washington, D.C., 347 pp.
- Beebe W (1946) Field notes on the snakes of Kartabo, British Guiana, and Caripito, Venezuela. Zoologica 31: 11–52.
- Cunha OR, Nascimento FP (1978) Ofídios da Amazônia. X. As cobras da região leste do Pará. Papéis Avulsos Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi 31: 1–218.
- Hedges SB, Marion AB, Lipp KM, Marin J, Vidal N (2014) A taxonomic framework for typhlopid snakes from the Caribbean and other regions (Reptilia, Squamata). Caribbean Herpetology 49: 1–61. DOI: 10.31611/ch.49
- Martins M, Oliveira ME (1998) Natural history of snakes in forests of the Manaus region, Central Amazonia, Brazil. Herpetological Natural History 6: 78–150.
- Dunn ER (1944) Los géneros de anfibios y reptiles de Colombia, III. Reptiles, orden de las serpientes. Caldasia 3: 155–224.
- Dixon JR, Soini P (1986) The reptiles of the upper Amazon Basin, Iquitos region, Peru. Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, 154 pp.
- Lynch JD (2015) The role of plantations of the African palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) in the conservation of snakes in Colombia. Caldasia 37: 169–182.
- Field notes of Andrés Felipe Aponte-Gutiérrez.
- Caicedo JR, Gutiérrez-Cárdenas P, Rivas G (2019) Amerotyphlops reticulatus. The IUCN Red List of threatened species. Available from: www.iucnredlist.org. DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2019-3.RLTS.T178605A44955523.en
- María José Quiroz, pers. comm.
- Valencia JH, Garzón-Tello K, Barragán-Paladines ME (2016) Serpientes venenosas del Ecuador: sistemática, taxonomía, historial natural, conservación, envenenamiento y aspectos antropológicos. Fundación Herpetológica Gustavo Orcés, Quito, 653 pp.
- Roze JA (1996) Coral snakes of the Americas: biology, indentification, and venoms. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, 328 pp.
- Carrillo E, Aldás A, Altamirano M, Ayala F, Cisneros-Heredia DF, Endara A, Márquez C, Morales M, Nogales F, Salvador P, Torres ML, Valencia J, Villamarín F, Yánez-Muñoz M, Zárate P (2005) Lista roja de los reptiles del Ecuador. Fundación Novum Millenium, Quito, 46 pp.
- Rincón-Aranguri M, Urbina-Cardona N, Galeano SP, Bock BC, Páez VP (2019) Road kill of snakes on a highway in an Orinoco ecosystem: landscape factors and species traits related to their mortality. Tropical Conservation Science 12: 1–18. DOI: 10.1177/1940082919830832
- Nogueira CC, Argôlo AJS, Arzamendia V, Azevedo JA, Barbo FE, Bérnils RS, Bolochio BE, Borges-Martins M, Brasil-Godinho M, Braz H, Buononato MA, Cisneros-Heredia DF, Colli GR, Costa HC, Franco FL, Giraudo A, Gonzalez RC, Guedes T, Hoogmoed MS, Marques OAV, Montingelli GG, Passos P, Prudente ALC, Rivas GA, Sanchez PM, Serrano FC, Silva NJ, Strüssmann C, Vieira-Alencar JPS, Zaher H, Sawaya RJ, Martins M (2019) Atlas of Brazilian snakes: verified point-locality maps to mitigate the Wallacean shortfall in a megadiverse snake fauna. South American Journal of Herpetology 14: 1–274. DOI: 10.2994/SAJH-D-19-00120.1
Appendix 1: Locality data used to create the distribution map of Amerotyphlops reticulatus in Ecuador (Fig. 2). Go to the section on symbols and abbreviations for a list of acronyms used.
Country | Province | Locality | Source |
Colombia | Caquetá | Florencia | Caicedo-Portilla 2011 |
Colombia | Putumayo | Puerto Leguizamo | Nogueira et al. 2019 |
Ecuador | Napo | Wild Sumaco Wildlife Sanctuary | Photo by Jeff Camper |
Ecuador | Orellana | Bloque 43, Campo ITT | Photo by María José Quiroz |
Ecuador | Orellana | Puesto Cavero, 1 km NW of | Nogueira et al. 2019 |
Ecuador | Orellana | San José de Payamino | Maynard et al. 2016 |
Ecuador | Pastaza | Río Pastaza | MCZ 36951 |
Ecuador | Pastaza | Río Pingullo | Nogueira et al. 2019 |
Ecuador | Sucumbíos | Adhán Payahüaje | Nogueira et al. 2019 |
Ecuador | Sucumbíos | Comunidad Zábalo | Cevallos Bustos 2010 |
Ecuador | Sucumbíos | Lagartococha | Dixon and Hendricks 1979 |
Ecuador | Sucumbíos | Laguna Grande | iNaturalist |
Ecuador | Sucumbíos | Limoncocha | Dixon and Hendricks 1979 |
Perú | Loreto | Río Huallaga | Nogueira et al. 2019 |